Are Marc and Craig Kielburger Still Working Together?

Yes—Marc and Craig Kielburger have continued to work together through Legacy+, the purpose-focused advisory company they launched after stepping back from their earlier leadership roles at WE Charity and its related organizations. Their work has shifted. The brothers are no longer best understood only as the youth activists behind Free the Children and WE. They now present themselves as advisers to businesses and foundations looking to connect their goals with social purpose.

That distinction matters. “Still working together” can more info mean sharing a public platform, running the same organization, or collaborating on specific projects. The clearest answer is that Marc and Craig have remained professional collaborators, with Legacy+ serving as the central organizing idea for their current work. Their roles and projects may evolve, so readers checking a particular event, company announcement or podcast should confirm the latest details directly.

From youth activism to advising organizations

The Kielburger brothers first became widely known through Free the Children, the youth-led organization Craig founded in 1995. Marc later became a prominent partner in the organization’s growth and public work. The initiative eventually became part of a broader group of programs and enterprises associated with the WE name, including WE Charity and WE Day events.

For years, the brothers’ public identity was tied to organizing young people, promoting service and encouraging schools and communities to take action. That work gave them a high-profile platform—and, later, placed their organizations under scrutiny. In 2020, controversy surrounding the federal government’s proposed WE Charity student-service program led to parliamentary attention and public questions about the organization’s finances and governance. The brothers announced that they would step back from their leadership roles at WE Charity.

That history is essential context, but it does not mean they stopped working together. Instead, the emphasis of their public work shifted from leading a large youth-activism organization to advising other organizations. Legacy+ is the name most associated with that next chapter.

What Legacy+ means in their work

Legacy+ places “legacy” at the centre of its approach. In this context, legacy is not just a record of past accomplishments. It is a way of asking what an organization wants to contribute over time—and how that intention might shape decisions, partnerships and public commitments.

The company’s focus is purpose-driven work for businesses, foundations and other organizations. That can include helping leaders define a social-purpose strategy, consider how it fits with their core operations and communicate it to employees, customers or the public. The broad language of purpose can be hard to evaluate on its own. A useful test is whether it leads to specific choices: a program with named beneficiaries, a measurable commitment, a partnership with clear responsibilities or a change in how a company operates.

That is also why the Kielburgers’ move into advising is different from their earlier work with young people. Youth activism is built around inviting participants to organize and act. Advising is more often a behind-the-scenes role: helping an organization decide what it wants to stand for, how to make that work credible and how to explain it. Both can involve social change, but the audiences and responsibilities are not the same.

Why the “co-lead” question is worth asking

People searching for whether the kielburger brothers still work together may also wonder whether they share a formal leadership title. That detail can change over time, and a title on an older page should not be treated as proof of a current role. The more durable point is that Marc and Craig have presented Legacy+ as a joint venture and have continued to appear together in connection with its work.

When describing them, “co-founders” is a sensible way to explain their shared role in establishing Legacy+. Use “co-lead” only when a current https://dlf-ne.org/what-is-legacy-and-what-do-they-actually-do/ company biography or announcement specifically uses that wording. It is more accurate to distinguish a shared business project from a precise job title than to assume both brothers hold identical executive positions at every stage.

Purpose-driven movements for companies and foundations

Legacy+ also reflects a wider shift in how companies and foundations talk about social purpose. Many organizations want to be seen as contributing to issues beyond their immediate business. The challenge is to make those claims concrete. A campaign or slogan alone does not show what changed, who benefited or how the organization will be held to its commitment.

For a company, purpose work might involve aligning a community investment with its business, setting a clear target or building a long-term partnership. For a foundation, it could mean clarifying the outcomes it wants to support and how it will work with grantees. In either case, the practical questions are similar:

    What specific issue is the organization trying to address? Who helped define the goal, including the people or communities affected? What resources, timeline and responsibilities are attached to the commitment? How will progress be reported, and what happens if the plan falls short?

These questions help separate a purpose statement from a working strategy. They are also useful when assessing the Kielburgers’ advisory work: the public-facing language describes a focus on legacy and purpose, while the details of any individual engagement depend on the client and project.

image

Podcasting as a public-facing platform

Advisory work often happens out of public view. Podcasting offers a different channel: it allows hosts and guests to discuss leadership, social issues and organizational change in a format that audiences can follow directly. Marc and Craig have used podcasting as part of their public-facing work, including a podcast partnership associated with iHeartMedia.

image

A podcast partnership can broaden distribution and put a conversation in front of listeners who might not encounter a consulting firm’s website or a corporate event. But a partnership with a media platform should not be confused with proof of a particular advisory relationship, nor does a podcast episode by itself demonstrate the results of a social-purpose initiative. It is a communications platform—one that can explain ideas, introduce guests and keep the brothers visible as public figures.

For readers checking whether a specific show is active, who produces it or which episodes are available, the most reliable source is the current show listing or an announcement from the partners. Podcast names, schedules and distribution arrangements can change. An older episode or press release may describe a past partnership rather than the present arrangement.

How the media references fit in

Coverage of the brothers may appear across local and city-focused outlets, including Streets of Toronto and Post City Magazines, Inc. Those publications can help readers place a story in its local media context, but an article mention is not the same as a corporate endorsement or a formal partnership with Legacy+.

For print-style browsing, readers may also come across digital editions hosted on Issuu. An Issuu digital editions link can provide access to a publication’s online issue when the publisher has made it available there. Check the publisher’s own site for the correct edition and date; a general Issuu link is not a substitute for a specific issue URL.

There is one detail worth making explicit when reviewing scraped or copied article text: no prices were present in the scraped article content. That means a price cannot be responsibly reported from that material. It should not be estimated, inferred from another service or filled in from an unrelated listing. If pricing matters, confirm it with the organization or the original, current source.

What has changed—and what has not

The straightforward answer is that Marc and Craig Kielburger have continued to collaborate, but the frame around that collaboration has changed. Their earlier public work centred on youth activism and a large network of programs. Their later work has been associated with Legacy+, advising organizations on purpose and legacy, and using public platforms such as podcasting to discuss those ideas.

That shift does not erase the questions raised about their earlier organizations. Nor does it mean every activity carrying one brother’s name is automatically a joint project. For a specific claim, check the date, the organization named and whether both brothers are actually identified as participants. Keep a timeline: an old WE-era biography, a Legacy+ profile and a current podcast listing may describe different stages of their careers.

Question Careful answer Are Marc and Craig still working together? Yes. Their ongoing professional collaboration has been associated with Legacy+ and related public work. Is their work still mainly youth activism? The emphasis has shifted toward advising companies and foundations on purpose and legacy. Are they always described as co-leaders? Not necessarily. Verify current titles rather than assuming a shared executive role. Were prices listed in the scraped article? No. The scraped content contained no prices, so none should be inferred from it.

The bottom line

Marc and Craig Kielburger are still working together, with Legacy+ providing a central name for their move from youth-activism leadership toward behind-the-scenes advising. Their current story is about applying ideas of legacy and purpose to companies and foundations, while podcasting gives them a public-facing way to discuss that work.

The most accurate summary is not that nothing changed, or that every project is identical. The brothers’ collaboration has continued; its setting and audience have shifted. For details about a particular role, partnership, podcast or price, look for a dated, primary-source confirmation rather than relying on an old profile or incomplete scraped text.